IPC 227 Violation of condition of remission of punishment

From Advocatespedia, ASSN: 153089
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This part rebuffs purposely infringement of the state of reduction of discipline. It says that whoever, having acknowledged any contingent abatement of discipline, abuses any state of the reduction intentionally, will be rebuffed with the first discipline given to him in the event that he has not gone through any piece of that discipline; and will be rebuffed with that much piece of the discipline which actually stays to be gone through by him in the event that he has gone through piece of the discipline as of now.


The arraignment should show that the blamed has acknowledged a contingent abatement for discipline and afterward has disregarded intentionally any of such conditions on which the reduction was conceded to him. The leader has no position to choose with respect to whether there has been any infringement of conditions on his part; it is additionally a piece of the legal interaction. The ability to suspend or dispatch sentences have been given to the proper government by area 432, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The offense under this part is cognizable, non-bailable and non-compoundable, and is offense by the court by which the first offense was offense.